Quote:
According to your definition I am apparently a lurker as well as probably 99% of the people on this site (by your definition anyone who has been here at least one year would have to have 1825 posts...there are only a handful of people over 1000 posts that I know of). Sorry to get analytical...it's just in my nature.


And I too am analytical in nature.....and nit-picking here <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

I don't know how to do the fancy things like quote two people in one response, so here is bostonmtnman's post as of his edit of Jan 31 2008 06:02 PM: "IF YOU POST MORE THAN 5 TIMES A WEEK, PLEASE ENJOY READING BUT DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST."

Looks like you did your math with 5 posts/day, rather than the definition of 5 posts/week (1825 vs. 260 posts, respectively). Either way, you are right in that you fit bostonmtnman's definition of a lurker, posting no more than 5x/week.