Quoted from that article:

If nature isn’t supposed to be for everyone, who gets to decide who it’s for?

This seems to me like a glaring fundamental fallacy. There is zero connection between geo-tagging a photo and who is given access to "nature".

First, nature is everywhere. We are part of "nature", as is every part of the earth. It's there wherever you go. Next, humans had access to nature before photography was invented, before writing was invented and before maps or magnetic compasses were invented. So how could failing to place a digital tag on a digital photo possibly determine who gets "nature"?

This is NOT an issue of fairness and equality despite anyone's efforts to depict it as such.