I have been told/lectured--in all seriousness--on a photo forum that I didn't correctly perceive the Rockwell genius solely because I didn't understand him, see?

A finer bit of circular reasoning I've never encountered.

So all hail Rockwell, jolly good, well met and all that.

Coincidentally, the "discussion" was about his S90 preview that I was pointing out didn't appear to warrant the hosannas being strewn and especially, his snide dismissal of missing key pieces (e.g., hooray, no pesky hotshoe!). I wasn't familiar with his stuff or his reputation so was taken by surprise with my trip to the principal's office.

I'll be pleased as a kitten if the camera proves brilliant in every way, but I don't need it because I have a more competent camera (based on features and specs) already.

Cheers,

Originally Posted By hatidua
Originally Posted By kbennett

I'm not sure how seriously Ken Rockwell's site is taken by most photographers.


-not seriously at all.
_________________________
--Rick