One of the causes of carbon monoxide production in stoves is the premature cooling of the flame prior to complete burning. Since alcohol stoves have longer flames than compressed gas or white gas stoves, I would assume that they also produce more carbon monoxide. BPL has done a study with a gas meter and has a link to the study. I was wondering if someone with a paid subscription could read it over and comment? Jim
_________________________
These are my own opinions based on wisdom earned through many wrong decisions. Your mileage may vary.
I think zen stoves has and incredible amount of info on combustion--- maybe to the point of overkill. http://zenstoves.net/COHazard.htm This is interesting: “Setting a stove at the highest output level that still produces blue flames produces the lowest levels of CO. Counter intuitively, setting a stove for low output, such as simmering, causes larger amounts of CO production than any other setting.” However, BPL looks at this differently… (I’ll leave it to subscribing).
Zen does theorize about alcohol; “If the molecular size of fuel particles has an impact on CO production, then fuels such as alcohols and liquefied petroleum gasses should in theory produce less CO than even white gas. ”
Another interesting Zen point: “The more a flame is disrupted, the more CO is produced. Placing a pot, or anything else for that matter, on a stove drastically increased CO production. So relatively speaking to the effects of CO production, using a stove to heat a tent is far less dangerous than using it to melt snow or cook with.”
In the BPL article, canister and gas stoves are all over the CO map. And they’re just relative measurements. So they have recommendations on good stoves in terms of minimum CO.
In general, both articles point out stoves should not be used in environments where CO can build up. This makes sense; the readings go to 0 out in the open.
IIUC more than CO production, the greater consideration with alcohol stoves is the fuel being used. What is the methanol fraction and what other denaturing compounds are in the mix? Reportedly, certain alcohol formulations are vile-smelling and quite headache-inducing.
To piggyback on the Zen stove notes, a major factor re. CO production is the distance between pot and flame. Many stoves have responded well (lowered CO levels) to raising the pot above the standard support height. Fiddling with one's own stove to figure this out would require a lab setup and instrumentation, of course.
IIUC more than CO production, the greater consideration with alcohol stoves is the fuel being used. What is the methanol fraction and what other denaturing compounds are in the mix? Reportedly, certain alcohol formulations are vile-smelling and quite headache-inducing.
I use plain old *methanol* (methyl hydrate) most of the time. It stinks no worse than anything else and certainly hasn't produced any ill effects.. No I don't *drink* it.
I've also used pure ethanol (everclear) as well as denatured alcohol. same thing..
Then there's "methylated spirits" which is the UK and australia's answer to denatured alcohol. they deliberately add smelly stuff to it. but it worked fine in the stove for me.
I'll add that I wouldn't use any stove where CO might be an issue. I don't use them in enclosed unvented spaces.
Barryp said "Another interesting Zen point: “The more a flame is disrupted, the more CO is produced. Placing a pot, or anything else for that matter, on a stove drastically increased CO production. So relatively speaking to the effects of CO production, using a stove to heat a tent is far less dangerous than using it to melt snow or cook with.”
An article I was reading in an Australian group with a lot of climbers was saying that modifying your white gas stove by raising the pots above the top of the normal flame pretty much eliminates CO production and makes them safe for use in tents.
I personally do not use alcohol stoves but I have noticed that they always have tall flames and thats why I was thinking that every alcohol stove has its flame majorly interrupted by the pot. The zen article said that heating your tent without a pot would produce far less CO than any use with a pan on it. Onereason I don't cook in my tent with white gas (or liquid fuel of any kind) is the smell of priming and the toxic fumes after extinguishing the flame. I cook in my tent with my Coleman Xtreme compressed gas stove with liquid fuel feed and ventilate well. As far as I know - popular alcohol stoves do not have air intakes to premix O2 but depend on it happening under the pot, thus pressurized stoves with premix air intakes should be safer by burning with a shorter flam.
From the zen article "Yellow flames suggest incomplete combustion's and generally associated with production of large amounts of CO. If you get yellow flames, you should consider shutting off your stove, possibly cleaning it (special attention given to the jet), replacing the fuel, and/or making sure it is sufficiently pressurized instead of subjecting yourself to deadly levels of CO. " Jim
Edited by Jimshaw (02/04/1008:27 PM)
_________________________
These are my own opinions based on wisdom earned through many wrong decisions. Your mileage may vary.
Registered: 02/03/06
Posts: 6800
Loc: Gateway to Columbia Gorge
I would never use a gas or alcohol or wood stove inside a tent--too much risk of fire! On rare occasions I've used the stove just outside the vestibule, where I can knock it away from the tent if it flares up. Silnylon, of course, is not fireproof, but even the supposedly "fireproof" tents still melt awfully fast!
If you absolutely must use the stove inside the tent, obviously plenty of ventilation is needed.
_________________________
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view--E. Abbey
I'm not too worried about Carbon Monoxide because I usually don't sit close enough to the stove to breathe it in. Often, I'm off doing other chores at a safe distance while my water boils (but close enough to keep an eye on it of course).
_________________________ Gear Talk There's no such thing as having too many sporks!
Why is this a topic of discussion. I do not think it is cause for concern when the stove is outside. The reason it is being dicussed is because it is winter and when its cold and the wind blows and its getting dark and you are hungry it is not much fun outside cooking and eating.
All that is needed is a simple little chimney so you do not have to risk your life or health by taking the stove inside with no chimney. The chimney has the added bonus of heat inside out of the wind. We are talking 12 ounces more weight and maybe the comfort is not worth it.
Our long-time Sponsor, BackcountryGear.com - The leading source for ultralite/lightweight outdoor gear:
Affiliate Disclaimer: This forum is an affiliate of BackcountryGear.com, Amazon.com, R.E.I. and others. The product links herein are linked to their sites. If you follow these links to make a purchase, we may get a small commission. This is our only source of support for these forums. Thanks.!