Backcountry Forum
Backpacking & Hiking Gear

Backcountry Forum
Our long-time Sponsor - the leading source for ultralite/lightweight outdoor gear
 
 
 

Amazon.com
Backpacking Forums
---- Our Gear Store ----
The Lightweight Gear Store
 
 WINTER CAMPING 

Shelters
Bivy Bags
Sleeping Bags
Sleeping Pads
Snow Sports
Winter Kitchen

 SNOWSPORTS 

Snowshoes
Avalanche Gear
Skins
Hats, Gloves, & Gaiters
Accessories

 ULTRA-LIGHT 

Ultralight Backpacks
Ultralight Bivy Sacks
Ultralight Shelters
Ultralight Tarps
Ultralight Tents
Ultralight Raingear
Ultralight Stoves & Cookware
Ultralight Down Sleeping Bags
Ultralight Synthetic Sleep Bags
Ultralight Apparel


the Titanium Page
WM Extremelite Sleeping Bags

 CAMPING & HIKING 

Backpacks
Tents
Sleeping Bags
Hydration
Kitchen
Accessories

 CLIMBING 

Ropes & Cordage
Protection & Hardware
Carabiners & Quickdraws
Climbing Packs & Bags
Big Wall
Rescue & Industrial

 MEN'S APPAREL 

Jackets
Shirts
Baselayer
Headwear
Gloves
Accessories

 WOMEN'S APPAREL 

Jackets
Shirts
Baselayer
Headwear
Gloves
Accessories

 FOOTWEAR 

Men's Footwear
Women's Footwear

 CLEARANCE 

Backpacks
Mens Apparel
Womens Apparel
Climbing
Footwear
Accessories

 BRANDS 

Black Diamond
Granite Gear
La Sportiva
Osprey
Smartwool

 WAYS TO SHOP 

Sale
Clearance
Top Brands
All Brands

 Backpacking Equipment 

Shelters
BackPacks
Sleeping Bags
Water Treatment
Kitchen
Hydration
Climbing


 Backcountry Gear Clearance

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#191378 - 07/19/15 10:23 AM Weight VS R-value
Wbuisman Offline
newbie

Registered: 07/19/15
Posts: 2
Hi,

My first post on this board! I have a dire question about my choice of gear.

I'll leave for the northern parts of scandinavia on July 28 with an average temperature of 5-12 degrees celcius.

I am doubting between packing my (fairly old) Thermarest Trail Regular mat (r value 5, 1050g weight) or my Exped Airmat 5M (r value 1,7 535g weight). Logically the exped packs smaller (half of the thermarest).

I have a thick synthetic sleeping bag (NORDIC -2 degree celcius comfort).

Do you reckon I'll be comfortably sleeping with those outdoor temperatures on the exped mat rather than the Thermarest?

I hope some of you have experience with this and might be able to answer my question!

Cheers,

Wijnand

Top
#191379 - 07/19/15 12:44 PM Re: Weight VS R-value [Re: Wbuisman]
bluefish Offline
member

Registered: 06/05/13
Posts: 680
I think you are on the edge of your lighter pads range, but the synthetic bag will help just a little to boost it. This is not scientific by any means, just from my past experience. If you can experience colder temps on your trip, or your Thermarest is so much more comfortable, I'd lean that way. It's hard to judge how much R-value the bottom of a compressed synthetic bag has. Here's a little test. Take a relatively flat package out of the refrigerator. Place it under your pad and sleeping bag. See how much cold is coming through both. Try it with your larger pad. Something from the refrigerator should be close to 5 deg. C.
_________________________
Charlie

Top
#191380 - 07/19/15 12:55 PM Re: Weight VS R-value [Re: Wbuisman]
aimless Online   content
Moderator

Registered: 02/05/03
Posts: 3292
Loc: Portland, OR
I would be inclined to take the lighter, uninsulated sleeping pad and take my chances with it. If necessary, you could boost the R-value of the airmat a bit by placing some items of clothing you aren't wearing underneath it. The length of daylight hours in Scandinavia in late July should work in your favor, too.

Top
#191381 - 07/19/15 02:00 PM Re: Weight VS R-value [Re: Wbuisman]
Wbuisman Offline
newbie

Registered: 07/19/15
Posts: 2
Thanks for the responses. I lean towards picking the Exped. It's actually a great idea to pick an item from the fridge and test that out.

Top
#191384 - 07/19/15 06:02 PM Re: Weight VS R-value [Re: Wbuisman]
wandering_daisy Offline
member

Registered: 01/11/06
Posts: 2865
Loc: California
I will be the one to disagree with the others! I am bias, because I sleep exceptionally cold.

You stated that the AVERAGE temperatures go down to 5C. Your sleeping bag's low rating is 2C. The sleeping bag ratings assume that you have an adequate pad. Microclimates while backpacking are often less than the "average" temperatures. As for extra clothes to put under the bag, if you have lots of extra clothes, you are then taking too many clothes. Better to take a better pad. I rarely have extra clothed to put under me - plus extra clothes are really lumpy!

The r-value for a pad twice the weight is more than twice the r-value of the lighter pad.

As far as more sunlight in Scandinavia- does not matter how much sunlight if you end up getting no sleep due to being cold, whether that is 3 hours a night of 8 hours a night.

I would buy a new pad that is between the 1.7 and 5 r-value.

Top
#191385 - 07/19/15 08:31 PM Re: Weight VS R-value [Re: wandering_daisy]
Glenn Roberts Online   content
Moderator

Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 2208
Loc: Southwest Ohio
I'm with Daisy on this one.

Your first priority is to take what you need for the worst reasonably-expected conditions. After you do that, reduce weight by gettting the lightest version of what works.

So, in this case, an adequate R-value is your first concern. I camp in those general temperatures, and I find that it's not unusual for a predicted 2C to run toward minus 2C, depending on your choice of campsite and the wind you're exposed to. I tend to go with an r-value of 3-4, unless I know I'm going to sleep on snow - then I want something more toward 5.

You can find such full-length pads that weigh less than 450 grams (the r-5.7 NeoAir XTherm, for example.)

Top
#191386 - 07/20/15 01:06 AM Re: Weight VS R-value [Re: Glenn Roberts]
OregonMouse Online   content
member

Registered: 02/03/06
Posts: 6799
Loc: Gateway to Columbia Gorge
I also am with W_D and Glenn. IMHO, a good night's sleep is well worth a little extra weight. If you're shivering, you won't be sleeping, or at least you'll wake up every half hour. Been there, done that, never again!

AS W_D mentioned, the "average" temp is definitely not a number on which you should base your planning--the lows could easily be 10* above or 10* below that number! (Well, maybe 5*C) I look for the record lows for the dates I'll be there, and pick a number perhaps halfway between that and the average.

As she and Glenn also mentioned, sleeping bag ratings are based on having an adequate pad. For a 20*F (-7*C) sleeping bag rating, the EN13537 laboratory tests use a pad with an R value of 5.
_________________________
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view--E. Abbey

Top
#191392 - 07/20/15 12:46 PM Re: Weight VS R-value [Re: Wbuisman]
finallyME Offline
member

Registered: 09/24/07
Posts: 2710
Loc: Utah
Another option is to take a second pad...a closed cell foam and put the ccf on top of the uninsulated inflatable. That should put you in the 2-3 R value range. And, you will have an indestructible mat that you can sit on in camp.

Personally, I would buy a lighter insulated inflatable if you think your thermorest is too heavy.
_________________________
I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money.

Top

Shout Box

Highest Quality Lightweight Down Sleeping Bags
 
Western Mountaineering Sleeping Bags
 
Lite Gear Talk - Featured Topics
Backcountry Discussion - Featured Topics
Make Your Own Gear - Featured Topics
Featured Photos
Spiderco Chaparral Pocketknife
David & Goliath
Also Testing
Trip Report with Photos
Seven Devils, Idaho
Oat Hill Mine Trail 2012
Dark Canyon - Utah
Who's Online
0 registered (), 180 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Noodles, McCrary, DanyBacky, Rashy Willia, WanderBison
13240 Registered Users
Forum Links
Disclaimer
Policies
Site Links
Backpacking.net
Lightweight Gear Store
Backpacking Book Store
Lightweight Zone
Hiking Essentials

Our long-time Sponsor, BackcountryGear.com - The leading source for ultralite/lightweight outdoor gear:

Backcountry Forum
 

Affiliate Disclaimer: This forum is an affiliate of BackcountryGear.com, Amazon.com, R.E.I. and others. The product links herein are linked to their sites. If you follow these links to make a purchase, we may get a small commission. This is our only source of support for these forums. Thanks.!
 
 

Since 1996 - the Original Backcountry Forum
Copyright © The Lightweight Backpacker & BackcountryForum