Backcountry Forum
Backpacking & Hiking Gear

Backcountry Forum
Our long-time Sponsor - the leading source for ultralite/lightweight outdoor gear
 
 
 

Amazon.com
Backpacking Forums
---- Our Gear Store ----
The Lightweight Gear Store
 
 WINTER CAMPING 

Shelters
Bivy Bags
Sleeping Bags
Sleeping Pads
Snow Sports
Winter Kitchen

 SNOWSPORTS 

Snowshoes
Avalanche Gear
Skins
Hats, Gloves, & Gaiters
Accessories

 ULTRA-LIGHT 

Ultralight Backpacks
Ultralight Bivy Sacks
Ultralight Shelters
Ultralight Tarps
Ultralight Tents
Ultralight Raingear
Ultralight Stoves & Cookware
Ultralight Down Sleeping Bags
Ultralight Synthetic Sleep Bags
Ultralight Apparel


the Titanium Page
WM Extremelite Sleeping Bags

 CAMPING & HIKING 

Backpacks
Tents
Sleeping Bags
Hydration
Kitchen
Accessories

 CLIMBING 

Ropes & Cordage
Protection & Hardware
Carabiners & Quickdraws
Climbing Packs & Bags
Big Wall
Rescue & Industrial

 MEN'S APPAREL 

Jackets
Shirts
Baselayer
Headwear
Gloves
Accessories

 WOMEN'S APPAREL 

Jackets
Shirts
Baselayer
Headwear
Gloves
Accessories

 FOOTWEAR 

Men's Footwear
Women's Footwear

 CLEARANCE 

Backpacks
Mens Apparel
Womens Apparel
Climbing
Footwear
Accessories

 BRANDS 

Black Diamond
Granite Gear
La Sportiva
Osprey
Smartwool

 WAYS TO SHOP 

Sale
Clearance
Top Brands
All Brands

 Backpacking Equipment 

Shelters
BackPacks
Sleeping Bags
Water Treatment
Kitchen
Hydration
Climbing


 Backcountry Gear Clearance

Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#169338 - 09/12/12 01:03 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
skcreidc Offline
member

Registered: 08/16/10
Posts: 1590
Loc: San Diego CA
Fare enough DT, but I am not telling you to not carry a weapon, just to keep learning and try to have an open mind prior to making a decision. Which you may or may not be doing...I can't tell via the Internet. There is at least one good study that strongly suggests that most would be better served by pepper spray, and none that say the opposite (for example the BYU study in Journal of Wildlife Managment 2008. Which I posted a link to about a year ago on this site). But most people haven't slept with their weapon.

Top
#169339 - 09/12/12 01:09 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
Blue_Ridge_Ninja Offline
member

Registered: 09/09/11
Posts: 98
Loc: North Georgia
There are only black bears in my area. I've seen them on a few different occasions and have never felt threatened. The ones that have caught sight of me have turned and walked (or scurried) off.

I view a firearm as a piece of emergency gear like any other - something that I hope I never have to use. When I'm going solo I carry, when I'm in a group I generally don't.

Top
#169340 - 09/12/12 01:34 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
Rick_D Offline
member

Registered: 01/06/02
Posts: 2939
Loc: NorCal
08.21.12 Interpret at will.
Originally Posted By DieselTwitch
either an old picture or just meant has a no hunting sign.
_________________________
--Rick

Top
#169342 - 09/12/12 02:07 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
Centuryhouse Offline
newbie

Registered: 09/07/12
Posts: 6
I think carrying is a good idea. The predators aren't always bears. As to being illegal to FIRE it in the park, I'd rather fire it in a life threatening situation and still be alive, than be dead and have obeyed the restriction.

In 2008 (most recent year's data I could find) the National Park Service reported 3,760 reported major crimes, including five homicides and 37 rapes.

According to an ABC article on the law change "Guns are now allowed in all but about 20 of the 392 locations the National Park Service governs, including Yellowstone, Yosemite, the Grand Canyon, Great Smoky Mountains and Rocky Mountain National Park. Firearms will be prohibited in visitors' centers and park rangers' offices because of a separate law banning guns in buildings where federal employees work."

Check this link out for some great info on carrying in National Parks, National Forests, and State Parks - especially questions 6-8: http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/FAQ.pdf

This might interest you as well - a bear charged two hikers and was stopped with a .45: http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/201...nd-preserve5943

Top
#169344 - 09/12/12 03:47 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: Centuryhouse]
Rick_D Offline
member

Registered: 01/06/02
Posts: 2939
Loc: NorCal
What you're really saying is National Park crime rates are vanishingly small, calculated against recreation visits. National Park Service, 2010:

All units--281,303,769
National parks--64,623,855

Perhaps a new slogan is in order: "Your National Parks--safer than any suburb could dream of being."

And as all backpackers know, the farther away from the parking lot you get, the safer you become. First rule of lightweight backpacking: items left at home are the easiest way to lighten your pack.

Cheers,
_________________________
--Rick

Top
#169345 - 09/12/12 04:01 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: Centuryhouse]
DieselTwitch Offline
member

Registered: 07/01/12
Posts: 64
Loc: Colorado
Originally Posted By Centuryhouse
I think carrying is a good idea. The predators aren't always bears. As to being illegal to FIRE it in the park, I'd rather fire it in a life threatening situation and still be alive, than be dead and have obeyed the restriction.

In 2008 (most recent year's data I could find) the National Park Service reported 3,760 reported major crimes, including five homicides and 37 rapes.

According to an ABC article on the law change "Guns are now allowed in all but about 20 of the 392 locations the National Park Service governs, including Yellowstone, Yosemite, the Grand Canyon, Great Smoky Mountains and Rocky Mountain National Park. Firearms will be prohibited in visitors' centers and park rangers' offices because of a separate law banning guns in buildings where federal employees work."

Check this link out for some great info on carrying in National Parks, National Forests, and State Parks - especially questions 6-8: http://www.handgunlaw.us/documents/FAQ.pdf

This might interest you as well - a bear charged two hikers and was stopped with a .45: http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/201...nd-preserve5943



The no discharge a firearm is a very ambiguous term/rule. You will never get arrested for firing your weapon to defend your self. They just don't want people turning NP into their own firing ranges.

I dont carry to protect my self from other people in the park... I think that only happens in the movies. haha smile

But really when Im back country the last thing I worry about is being robed for my sleeping bag and the 50$ i carry with me.... lol

Top
#169366 - 09/13/12 09:10 AM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
Ewker Offline
member

Registered: 09/17/09
Posts: 222
Loc: Tennessee
Originally Posted By DieselTwitch


I dont carry to protect my self from other people in the park... I think that only happens in the movies. haha smile


if that was suppose to be funny it wasn't

Top
#169384 - 09/13/12 08:50 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
Samoset Offline
member

Registered: 07/04/08
Posts: 429
Loc: Newnan ,GA
Originally Posted By DieselTwitch
I was reading it as I posted it.

I've personally been rushed before in combat and I can tell you can get more than one round off. And if your using the right ammo. HP or BT it will expand and destroy the internals.

I've been maced before for training and the second time is not as bad as the first. So lets say you encounter a bear that has been maced before. 20$ says its going to care less about the spray this time.

In it boils down to personal preference and what you feel comfortable with. Personally I like my hand guns not to have safeties. I can shoot from the hip and continue to fire all the way to a standard frontal fire position. I spend at least one day a week training in a firing range and Im not a fallow shot by any means. Thats why I will recommend Spray to any one who is not 100% comfortable with a gun.


I honestly would hope that a trained soldier. That is the range weakly would know enough about gun laws and bi-laws that he could do some simple research"Think Google" that he wouldn't trouble a bunch of backpacking hippies with the debate!

Which this is not a question as posted.

If you feel comfy carrying and it legal then do it.

It's usually the guys with the 35lb packs + 6 lbs of cold steal strapd to there hip that usually ask a barefoot hammock sleeping hippie like me how do you walk so far.

H.Y.O.H

_________________________
Some peopole live life day by day. Try step by step.

Top
#169388 - 09/13/12 09:04 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
Samoset Offline
member

Registered: 07/04/08
Posts: 429
Loc: Newnan ,GA
Originally Posted By DieselTwitch
Originally Posted By OregonMouse
The rules are that if you can carry legally in that state (remember that a lot of states don't honor concealed carry permits from other states and issue permits only to state residents), you can carry a gun in a national park. It is, however, illegal to fire a gun in a national park! In other words, why bother--any weapon that will stop a bear is heavy! I haven't yet heard if the recent incident in Olympic National Park, in which a hiker broke a leg and was found only after he fired several shots to alert searchers, will result in the hiker's being prosecuted (I hope not!).

The literature states exactly the opposite of what you claim--bear spray is actually more effective than a firearm. Nothing, of course, is 100% effective against an angry bear. Here's one article. Here's another one. It takes an extremely well-aimed shot with an extra-heavy caliber weapon to down a charging bear. Few people can shoot that well! There have been a considerable number of fatalities of folks who shot and only wounded a bear. A wounded bear is an extremely angry bear!


I to have seen many articles written that say beer spay is better than a gun. and Its been countered in many articles that the guns used in most of those Incidents where undersized. I won't carry anything smaller than a 357 mag and even that thats to small in my mind.

I base my preferences on real world experience and experiences of those that I know.

So far I've had 5 friends that have been attacked by bears, All Grizzlies, and ALL in Alaska. 2 of them used beer spray... they are now both disfigured and handicap. the bear spray was totally ineffective and failed to stop the bear. in both chases it clamped down on their hand/arm and one of them is missing an ear....

The other 3 carried firearms. 45LC and a two 45mag.... All three of them dropped their attackers in 1 shot..... No injuries.

I will NEVER carry bear spray an no amount of articles written by gun controls nuts will convince me to carry bear spray.

I have no intention of carrying a gun into a NP just to shoot it off. If I shoot it its to kill an attacker no plink into a tree. I've been in combat and I don't pull my gun out unless I have a target and plan to drop it. It should also be noted that even if a bear is near I still wouldn't shoot it. I know that prevention is best way to prevent a bear attack. But having friends attacked I will always carry protection.

I'm not sure where you got the idea that I was going to use my gun to call for help....? I carry a HAM radio and a SPOT tracker for that.

The only states that do not honor my CC Permit are CA, NV, OR, WA, MN, OH, WV, VA, SC, NY, ME, NJ, CT, RI, MA, MD, NY and HI. None of which I plan on going to to expect maybe OR, and WA.

Now that that is out of the way I want to reiterate my original post... just look for the rules on open carry verse concealed


Ok by no means am I trying to make lite of your friends situations. And I sincerely feel for them. But where did you meet these people in a support group for grizzly victims.

Other wise you might just want to stay out of the woods because with statistics like that. the odds are not in your favor.

I'm just sayin I've met a whole whole lot of outdoors type people soldiers, hunters ,anglers, hammers, back packers the list goes on and on and a lot of the carried fire arms a lot didnt.

Luckily none attacked by bears of any sort.
_________________________
Some peopole live life day by day. Try step by step.

Top
#169392 - 09/13/12 10:41 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: Samoset]
DieselTwitch Offline
member

Registered: 07/01/12
Posts: 64
Loc: Colorado
Originally Posted By Samoset
Originally Posted By DieselTwitch
I was reading it as I posted it.

I've personally been rushed before in combat and I can tell you can get more than one round off. And if your using the right ammo. HP or BT it will expand and destroy the internals.

I've been maced before for training and the second time is not as bad as the first. So lets say you encounter a bear that has been maced before. 20$ says its going to care less about the spray this time.

In it boils down to personal preference and what you feel comfortable with. Personally I like my hand guns not to have safeties. I can shoot from the hip and continue to fire all the way to a standard frontal fire position. I spend at least one day a week training in a firing range and Im not a fallow shot by any means. Thats why I will recommend Spray to any one who is not 100% comfortable with a gun.


I honestly would hope that a trained soldier. That is the range weakly would know enough about gun laws and bi-laws that he could do some simple research"Think Google" that he wouldn't trouble a bunch of backpacking hippies with the debate!

Which this is not a question as posted.

If you feel comfy carrying and it legal then do it.

It's usually the guys with the 35lb packs + 6 lbs of cold steal strapd to there hip that usually ask a barefoot hammock sleeping hippie like me how do you walk so far.

H.Y.O.H



Wow that was a little rude!

I don't know what weapons you've looked at by my HEAVIEST handgun a 44 mag, 6 shooter, long barrel is 3.3 lbs. Also, as of today I've dropped my pack weight below 30 lbs, Shaved off with a new mat and bag.

Also, I love bare foot walking hippies, they give us something to laugh at when we are plucking them out of the forest in a $40M army helicopter because they are lost and out of food like we did 3 times last summer smile Not to mention the use of the $45M AH-64 gunship that used its FLIR to locate the nut cases smile so by all mean continue to walk barefoot with minimal gear and I will continue to rescue you when you get lost, hurt, or caught in a bad spring snow storm. To each his own, right?

I posted this topic on here because of the huge discrepancy ( big word for an army guy i know, I googled it! ) between laws governing carrying in NPs. One site says one while another may say some thing totally different. Even the park web pages can't totally agree. I figured I would ask a group of people that spend time in the park and more than just one park like a park ranger, I've asked them and each time get a different answer.

Top
#169393 - 09/13/12 10:46 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: Samoset]
DieselTwitch Offline
member

Registered: 07/01/12
Posts: 64
Loc: Colorado
Originally Posted By Samoset
Originally Posted By DieselTwitch
Originally Posted By OregonMouse
The rules are that if you can carry legally in that state (remember that a lot of states don't honor concealed carry permits from other states and issue permits only to state residents), you can carry a gun in a national park. It is, however, illegal to fire a gun in a national park! In other words, why bother--any weapon that will stop a bear is heavy! I haven't yet heard if the recent incident in Olympic National Park, in which a hiker broke a leg and was found only after he fired several shots to alert searchers, will result in the hiker's being prosecuted (I hope not!).

The literature states exactly the opposite of what you claim--bear spray is actually more effective than a firearm. Nothing, of course, is 100% effective against an angry bear. Here's one article. Here's another one. It takes an extremely well-aimed shot with an extra-heavy caliber weapon to down a charging bear. Few people can shoot that well! There have been a considerable number of fatalities of folks who shot and only wounded a bear. A wounded bear is an extremely angry bear!


I to have seen many articles written that say beer spay is better than a gun. and Its been countered in many articles that the guns used in most of those Incidents where undersized. I won't carry anything smaller than a 357 mag and even that thats to small in my mind.

I base my preferences on real world experience and experiences of those that I know.

So far I've had 5 friends that have been attacked by bears, All Grizzlies, and ALL in Alaska. 2 of them used beer spray... they are now both disfigured and handicap. the bear spray was totally ineffective and failed to stop the bear. in both chases it clamped down on their hand/arm and one of them is missing an ear....

The other 3 carried firearms. 45LC and a two 45mag.... All three of them dropped their attackers in 1 shot..... No injuries.

I will NEVER carry bear spray an no amount of articles written by gun controls nuts will convince me to carry bear spray.

I have no intention of carrying a gun into a NP just to shoot it off. If I shoot it its to kill an attacker no plink into a tree. I've been in combat and I don't pull my gun out unless I have a target and plan to drop it. It should also be noted that even if a bear is near I still wouldn't shoot it. I know that prevention is best way to prevent a bear attack. But having friends attacked I will always carry protection.

I'm not sure where you got the idea that I was going to use my gun to call for help....? I carry a HAM radio and a SPOT tracker for that.

The only states that do not honor my CC Permit are CA, NV, OR, WA, MN, OH, WV, VA, SC, NY, ME, NJ, CT, RI, MA, MD, NY and HI. None of which I plan on going to to expect maybe OR, and WA.

Now that that is out of the way I want to reiterate my original post... just look for the rules on open carry verse concealed


Ok by no means am I trying to make lite of your friends situations. And I sincerely feel for them. But where did you meet these people in a support group for grizzly victims.

Other wise you might just want to stay out of the woods because with statistics like that. the odds are not in your favor.

I'm just sayin I've met a whole whole lot of outdoors type people soldiers, hunters ,anglers, hammers, back packers the list goes on and on and a lot of the carried fire arms a lot didnt.

Luckily none attacked by bears of any sort.


Two of them are anglers from WY and the rest are just people that I lived with in AK. If you lived in AK you quickly learn that bear attacks are a lot more common then are reported. Thats why the articles about bear spray being more effective are so unbalanced. They don't account for all the attacks that are never reported because the bear is defeated. Only when a gun doesn't work is it reported.

I saw a article earlier this year that said there were 290 bear attacks a year in Alaska... we all laughed... We were willing to bet that there are 290 bear attacks a month!

Top
#169401 - 09/14/12 02:18 AM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
TomD Offline
Moderator

Registered: 10/30/03
Posts: 4963
Loc: Marina del Rey,CA
Bears come out of the forest surrounding the foothill communities in LA regularly. There was one tonight on the news, being chased around by the sheriffs and animal control. plus a helicopter. Other than jumping into a swimming pool for a couple of minutes, he or she just wandered around the neighborhood then disappeared back into the woods. That is as close as most people will come to a bear here in CA.
_________________________
Don't get me started, you know how I get.

Top
#169410 - 09/14/12 10:33 AM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: TomD]
lori Offline
member

Registered: 01/22/08
Posts: 2801
Originally Posted By TomD
Bears come out of the forest surrounding the foothill communities in LA regularly. There was one tonight on the news, being chased around by the sheriffs and animal control. plus a helicopter. Other than jumping into a swimming pool for a couple of minutes, he or she just wandered around the neighborhood then disappeared back into the woods. That is as close as most people will come to a bear here in CA.


There are two ways to see a bear in CA. Go to Yosemite/SEKI, or go to LA. The rest of the time you see (at most) the hind end of the critter as he beats it for the next ridge/into the trees.

Most of the coastal range has no bears at all south of SF. North of it there are occasional sitings. Bear cans are required for the very wild and remote Lost Coast.

I am encouraged to carry by the sheriff's office, not because of bears, but because our searches sometimes cross low elevation areas where marijuana gardens are. Plus, we do occasionally look for people who don't want to be found. I haven't bothered - most of the times our teams have a deputy attached to them with his mace, gun, etc and volunteer searchers are mandated to stay out of the way.

The rest of the time - FORGET IT. Guns are wasted weight. I'm not a hunter but I grew up in that culture. I'm entirely pragmatic about things. If I'm going to use it I'll carry it. I'd never use either a gun or bear spray anywhere in California. Last thing I'd bother with. Much more important to pay attention to the real killers - water and rocks.
_________________________
"In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities. In the expert's mind there are few." Shunryu Suzuki

http://hikeandbackpack.com

Top
#169412 - 09/14/12 12:09 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
Heather-ak Offline
member

Registered: 07/11/10
Posts: 597
Loc: Fairbanks, AK
I have lived in Fairbanks for 8 years. I have not seen a bear yet - which in my OPINION means I'm doing something right. blush Now other parts of the state have more bears (Kodiak etc,) but I do see scat. However, I'm still more scared of moose.

I do carry (a BEAST - Ruger GP 100 - .357 - if I run out of ammo I can then use it as a heavy blunt instrument), but I don't carry because of bears, Alaska has one of the highest violent crimes against women numbers and I like to hike alone. I do try to avoid times when bears are more aggressive - spring, when they just come out of "hibernation" and the fall when they are trying to fatten up. I have learned that certain areas in Alaska have less protein available (such as Denali) and I avoid those particularly in the fall (we don't hunt, I don't have the freezer space). I do believe hunters come in more "contact" - both critters are hunting and hunters are being quiet and surprising bears that might otherwise avoid humans.

I don't carry bear spray because of the short distance involved and the possibility of wind pushing it back at me. We own some and have done test scenarios, but I don't feel comfortable with it.

Top
#169413 - 09/14/12 12:23 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: DieselTwitch]
skcreidc Offline
member

Registered: 08/16/10
Posts: 1590
Loc: San Diego CA
I was just thinking of Heather while I was reading this. I have only carried in Montana while I was working as a geologist there, 44 mag. I have never been to Alaska, much to my dismay.

My interest in this topic is the 290 attacks per year or month. From what I have seen in the newspaper articles, the most cited study is that BYU study from 2008. Even the 290 attacks a YEAR could put the statistical results at risk. In other words, the study would be bull. How do they keep track of this stuff in ALaska? It is a big enough place I could see people blowing off reporting it. Don't get me wrong on this, I would just like to know what IS an accurate attack rate estimate. In my mind, everything else drops out from this.

What do the people FROM Alaska think?


Edited by skcreidc (09/14/12 12:27 PM)

Top
#169414 - 09/14/12 12:34 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: lori]
Samoset Offline
member

Registered: 07/04/08
Posts: 429
Loc: Newnan ,GA
First off , Let me apologize DT I ment no disrespect or to come off as rude. I simply ment to be direct. To answer your original question the NP web site has a pdf whith I believe what your looking for that can be found here.

http://www.nps.gov/yell/parkmgmt/upload/gunsinparks_IMR_2-2010.pdf

Like I said my original post formats where bad and I apoligize. I have the utmost respect for what you do. And for you as an individual!
_________________________
Some peopole live life day by day. Try step by step.

Top
#169415 - 09/14/12 12:47 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: skcreidc]
Heather-ak Offline
member

Registered: 07/11/10
Posts: 597
Loc: Fairbanks, AK
Unless I was physically damaged in some way, I wouldn't know who to report something to. I might call the rangers station if I was bluff charged on a well known trail - say Angel Rocks, or the Granite Tors (local "high" traffic areas.) I guess if I was in the bush, what would be the point of reporting it? And what defines an attack? A bluff charge? A bear eating your plane? (yeah it happens - you don't keep food in planes!!! or cars for that matter) How about trying to tear the door off your cabin? (regularly happens according to the people I know that have cabins in the bush.) I define an attack as physical contact - bear knocks you down, or you shoot bear OR being stalked (something up here that happens mostly with blacks.) I don't think there are that many physical contacts with bears - but I do think there is a lot of "interaction" with them.

Did that make sense?

Top
#169417 - 09/14/12 01:37 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: TomD]
PerryMK Online   content
member

Registered: 01/18/02
Posts: 1391
Loc: Florida panhandle
Originally Posted By TomD
Bears come out of the forest surrounding the foothill communities in LA regularly.

It might surprise people to know the same thing happens in Tallahassee, Florida. About once every year or two a habituated bear makes the local paper for its antics in town. South of town a small bear knocked a bicyclist over on a paved bike path about 2 years ago. It is believed the bear didn't intend to charge; it just wasn't paying attention. I don't know how they know that.

I've only met bears twice in the woods. Once while hiking along the AT along the TN/NC border. Another time in AK while walking a trail in the McCarthy-Kennicot area. Both times the bear looked right at me (within 50 yards I might add) and sauntered back into the woods. When I was a kid I once saw a polar bear in Churchhill, MB but that was near the town dump and we were trying to spot a bear.

To answer the OP's question, I only go into the National Forest (south of Tallahassee) during the winter when it is nice to hike. I invariably see hunters carrying rifles. I have never noticed a handgun. I'm not commenting on their legality, just saying I haven't seen one.

Top
#169418 - 09/14/12 02:23 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: Heather-ak]
skcreidc Offline
member

Registered: 08/16/10
Posts: 1590
Loc: San Diego CA
That definitely made sense Heather. My memory of the number of incidents or attacks they had in the data base is something like 6 or 7 hundred. That's less than 4 years worth if the 290 a year number is reasonable...you see where I'm going with this. Just from an analysis standpoint it makes huge difference. I'll have to see if I can get a copy of the article free somewhere rather than just the abstract so I can look at the methodology used for sifting data.

We saw quite a few bears as a family in the 60's and 70's. Our first time to the Southern Sierra, I was 10 and my sister was 8, is packed with memories of my dad dealing with a black bear who had apparently been fed by a girl scout troupe a few
days prior to us arriving (this according to the ranger stationed at bear paw meadow). I was shown by my dad the next day the marks on the ground left by the bear as he watched us all night from a high spot a short distance away. Because of us kids, I don't think dad slept at all that night. I learned a lot that trip.

Top
#169423 - 09/14/12 09:56 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: skcreidc]
Samoset Offline
member

Registered: 07/04/08
Posts: 429
Loc: Newnan ,GA
Well according to this article I'm safe aslong as I make one one of the other TWO guys carry the gun. Maybe I could convince the second in to carrying the spray.

Me ill be carrying the fly rod as I'm sure we will make good use of that!

http://www.alaska-bear-viewing.net/bear_attacks.htm

in all serious though if I every make it out to AK for some fly fishing. You better believe one of us will be packing.
_________________________
Some peopole live life day by day. Try step by step.

Top
#169431 - 09/15/12 11:22 AM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: Samoset]
billstephenson Offline
Moderator

Registered: 02/07/07
Posts: 3917
Loc: Ozark Mountains in SW Missouri
Quote:
in all serious though if I every make it out to AK for some fly fishing. You better believe one of us will be packing.


I'd suppose I'd just tend to stay away from where the bears are fishing. I'd just kind of figure they have rights and are strict about not being infringed upon.

It's kind of like deer season here. It sucks because those two weeks are prime time for backpacking, but I don't go then. I let the hunters alone, it's their time and place, they have rights and they own them.

I found this interesting in the link you provided:

"As i am not aware of any bear attacks on a group of 3 or more ever in the state of Alaska. 94% of the time it is a single individual either jogging-biking or hunting and they startle a bear and they are attacked."

That's profound, and it's no accident or statistical anomaly either. Those bears know when they're outnumbered. That being the case, I might want to travel with at least two buddies and make it point to stay close together.

And this:

"As many Bear viewing guides in the state know bears often donīt even look up as they walk the well worn paths of rivers and lakes."

People tend to hike like that too, and it would suck to run head on into a bear that was doing it.


Edited by billstephenson (09/15/12 11:37 AM)
Edit Reason: added a bit...
_________________________
--

"You want to go where?"



Top
#169432 - 09/15/12 11:59 AM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: billstephenson]
skcreidc Offline
member

Registered: 08/16/10
Posts: 1590
Loc: San Diego CA
There was that recent event of a NOLS group apparently surprising a bear in AK which made national news. But I think in general that statement about groups of 3 or 4 being less likely to draw an attack from a bear seem valid, possibly because of the noise or smell. My wife and I want to go to the Canadian Rockies next summer and it is suggested to go out in groups of at least when hiking. We will be alone on our 25th anniversary so I am not sure how we are going to do this at this point in time.

Bill, I think you hit the mark when you point out how most people have their head down when hiking and are just focused on getting somewhere. Bound to be some collisions if you are not making noise and not really focused on what is going on around you.

Top
#169434 - 09/15/12 02:24 PM Re: Guns in National Parks - the rules? [Re: skcreidc]
skcreidc Offline
member

Registered: 08/16/10
Posts: 1590
Loc: San Diego CA
I feel pretty confident around black bears and mountain lion. But my experience with griz is jammed into a 4 month period that was about 30 years ago. And my wife is freaked about any predators, so I think I will do something I have never done before. Hire a guide in the Canadian Rockies. This looks to be pretty easy to do in the lake Louise area. At least the will be three of us then at a minimum, my wife will feel safer, and I'll get to learn some things I normally would not.

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Shout Box

Highest Quality Lightweight Down Sleeping Bags
 
Western Mountaineering Sleeping Bags
 
Lite Gear Talk - Featured Topics
Backcountry Discussion - Featured Topics
Make Your Own Gear - Featured Topics
Featured Photos
Spiderco Chaparral Pocketknife
David & Goliath
Also Testing
Trip Report with Photos
Seven Devils, Idaho
Oat Hill Mine Trail 2012
Dark Canyon - Utah
Who's Online
0 registered (), 160 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Noodles, McCrary, DanyBacky, Rashy Willia, WanderBison
13240 Registered Users
Forum Links
Disclaimer
Policies
Site Links
Backpacking.net
Lightweight Gear Store
Backpacking Book Store
Lightweight Zone
Hiking Essentials

Our long-time Sponsor, BackcountryGear.com - The leading source for ultralite/lightweight outdoor gear:

Backcountry Forum
 

Affiliate Disclaimer: This forum is an affiliate of BackcountryGear.com, Amazon.com, R.E.I. and others. The product links herein are linked to their sites. If you follow these links to make a purchase, we may get a small commission. This is our only source of support for these forums. Thanks.!
 
 

Since 1996 - the Original Backcountry Forum
Copyright © The Lightweight Backpacker & BackcountryForum