Backcountry Forum
Backpacking & Hiking Gear

Backcountry Forum
Our long-time Sponsor - the leading source for ultralite/lightweight outdoor gear
Backpacking Forums
backcountry gear

---- Our Gear Store ----
The Lightweight Gear Store

Bivy Bags
Sleeping Bags
Sleeping Pads
Snow Sports
Winter Kitchen


Avalanche Gear
Hats, Gloves, & Gaiters


Ultralight Backpacks
Ultralight Bivy Sacks
Ultralight Shelters
Ultralight Tarps
Ultralight Tents
Ultralight Raingear
Ultralight Stoves & Cookware
Ultralight Down Sleeping Bags
Ultralight Synthetic Sleep Bags
Ultralight Apparel

the Titanium Page
WM Extremelite Sleeping Bags


Sleeping Bags


Ropes & Cordage
Protection & Hardware
Carabiners & Quickdraws
Climbing Packs & Bags
Big Wall
Rescue & Industrial






Men's Footwear
Women's Footwear


Mens Apparel
Womens Apparel


Black Diamond
Granite Gear
La Sportiva


Top Brands
All Brands

 Backpacking Equipment 

Sleeping Bags
Water Treatment

 Backcountry Gear Clearance

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#124693 - 12/04/09 12:18 PM 0F winter bag: LL Bean vs. Marmot
ohiohiker Offline

Registered: 07/20/07
Posts: 127
Loc: Ohio
I'm looking at getting a winter bag rated at 0F with around 600 fill power down and a max budget around $270. The LL Bean 0F down bag seems like a good price, but I'm guessing that the comparable Marmot Never Summer bag quality is higher?

Anyone have experience or insight into LL Bean down bag quality? They don't publish detailed specs like loft and fill weight, so that makes me suspicious. I'm leaning toward the Marmot.

#124709 - 12/04/09 06:14 PM Re: 0F winter bag: LL Bean vs. Marmot [Re: ohiohiker]
oldranger Offline

Registered: 02/23/07
Posts: 1735
Loc: California (southern)
I have a Marmot bag that has been in steady use since 1983 and it has served very capably. It is a little worn now, but I still take it on backpack trips. Marmot gear is very high quality.

I have not used a "bean bag," but their items that I have used have been very good. They have an iron clad guarantee, so you could probably return it with no problems.

Which is the lightest? That would be crucial for me.

#124711 - 12/04/09 06:27 PM Re: 0F winter bag: LL Bean vs. Marmot [Re: ohiohiker]
Zalman Offline

Registered: 10/25/09
Posts: 97
Loc: Olympic Peninsula, Washington,...
I have never used an L.L. Bean bag, but have heavily used a 0° Marmot bag for 15 years, in all seasons. It is still in perfect condition, huge loft, and ferociously warm.

I recently replaced it, to shave off a pound of bag weight, with a new 0° model from Marmot.

L.L. Bean's offering would have to be a very high quality product to compare well to Marmot.
It's easy to be a holy man on top of a mountain.
-- Larry Darrell

#124720 - 12/04/09 10:29 PM Re: 0F winter bag: LL Bean vs. Marmot [Re: ohiohiker]
Jimshaw Offline

Registered: 10/22/03
Posts: 3939
Loc: Bend, Oregon

Quality is a difficult thing to put a finger on. I have LLbean full zipper packlite pants that are very light, rugged, have never failed me and are my constant winter companion. I like their guarantee. Marmot gear is also excellent, BUT I have had 2 marmot jackets (expensive ones) delaminate and they replaced one, can't replace the other but they did offer to try, and one Marmott coat made in China was made with an inferior zipper apparently substituted in China, they replaced the zipper.

BUT what you want to know is 2 things - what is the loft of the bag since thickness = warmth almost, and which bag will fit you the best since your body size and how it fits the bag is absolutely as important as brand, loft, or the value of the down, OR ITS TEMP RATING. I can attest that 550 down can be very warm and rugged. I also had a US mountain regular military bag with a fill of "chicken and water fowl feathers" that had a militarized cotton shell, and is was perhaps one of the warmest most comfortable bags I've owned.

Look for a bag with a good "foot box", any quality bag will have good one designed to contain feet without them pushing into the bag and freezing your toes. If you need to wear socks in your bag in conditions warmer than its rating, keep looking.

Also these bags last forever unless someone destroys it washing it in detergent and a used bag 10 years old may still be an excellent bag.
Jim crazy

Edited by Jimshaw (12/04/09 10:31 PM)
These are my own opinions based on wisdom earned through many wrong decisions. Your mileage may vary.

#124815 - 12/06/09 02:36 PM Re: 0F winter bag: LL Bean vs. Marmot [Re: ohiohiker]
ohiohiker Offline

Registered: 07/20/07
Posts: 127
Loc: Ohio
Thanks for the feedback everyone.

LL Bean doesn't state loft or fill weight, but I called them, and they were able to come up with a fill weight after keeping me on hold for a few minutes. The LL Bean down seems to be slightly higher quality if their claimed fill power number is accurate--who knows though. The Marmot bag is EN 13537 tested. One reviewer on Bean's site complained about the zipper on another Bean down bag getting stuck on the draft tube all of the time.

Marmot Never Summer:
Weight: 3 lbs, 9 oz
Fill weight: 30 oz
Down fill power: 600+ goose down

LL Bean 0F:
Weight: 3 lbs, 1 oz
Fill weight: 30.35 oz
Down fill power: 650 goose down

Bean also has a -20 F bag for 1 lb/$90 more which is looking like an attractive option too. crazy

Edited by ohiohiker (12/06/09 02:39 PM)

#124824 - 12/06/09 05:37 PM Re: 0F winter bag: LL Bean vs. Marmot [Re: ohiohiker]
thecook Offline

Registered: 10/03/08
Posts: 541
Loc: Minnesota
I can't speak to the quality of Bean's regular bags but I have an older North Col bag from them. It is rated to -10 and I have been comfortable down to -15F. All the rest of the gear I have gotten from them has been the highest quality. It is not necessarily the lightest weight but well built and reasonablly priced for the quality.
If I wouldn't eat it at home, why would I want to eat it on the trail?

#124829 - 12/06/09 06:54 PM Re: 0F winter bag: LL Bean vs. Marmot [Re: ohiohiker]
OregonMouse Offline

Registered: 02/03/06
Posts: 6561
Loc: Gateway to Columbia Gorge
Since there are a number of different levels involved in EN13537 ratings, it doesn't help when the company just states one temperature rating and doesn't say which one it is.

Here are the levels:
• The EN 13537 Upper Limit or Maximum Temperature is the highest temperature at which a ‘standard’ adult male is able to have a comfortable night’s sleep without excess sweating.
• The EN 13537 Comfort rating is based on a ‘standard’ woman having a comfortable night’s sleep.
• The EN 13537 Lower Limit is based on the lowest temperature at which as ‘standard’ adult male is deemed to be able to have a comfortable night’s sleep.
• The EN13537 Extreme rating is a survival only rating for a ‘standard’ adult woman. “In the risk range a strong sensation of cold has to be expected and there is a risk of health damage due to hypothermia.” This is an extreme survival rating only and it is not advisable for consumers to rely on this rating for general use. The best guideline temperatures for purchase decisions are the TComfort and TLimit ratings.

For me I'd want the "Standard Woman," plus another 5* F.

Most sleeping bag ratings in the US are, IMHO, fictional. I have done well with Western Mountaineering, though.

Edited by OregonMouse (12/06/09 06:57 PM)
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view--E. Abbey

#125024 - 12/11/09 10:49 AM Re: 0F winter bag: LL Bean vs. Marmot [Re: ohiohiker]
drow42 Offline

Registered: 03/27/04
Posts: 144
Loc: Washington, DC
If you poke around the interwebs, there are some good clearance deals on the Golite Venture 0, a 800 fill bag, 3lbs 1oz reg (3lbs 3oz long), 7inches loft.

I just picked one up for $275, but have not tested it. Construction looks good, zippers alright, not great. But if it were me, for the same money, same weight,I would expect the 800 fill to out perform 600, leading me to think the LLBean is probably over rated.

#125167 - 12/13/09 11:22 PM Re: 0F winter bag: LL Bean vs. Marmot [Re: ohiohiker]
Lucky K Offline

Registered: 01/13/09
Posts: 4
Loc: NY
I have the LL Bean Katahdin Climashield Sleeping Bag, Semi-Rectangular 40°.

I've only used it a couple of times, but it was warm, light, and seems generally well constructed.


Shout Box

Highest Quality Lightweight Down Sleeping Bags
Western Mountaineering Sleeping Bags
Lite Gear Talk - Featured Topics
Pullover vs Zip Rain Jacket
by 4evrplan
09/13/18 05:12 PM
Multitool or knife scissors or dedicated scissors.
by SJS
08/29/18 09:32 AM
Sawyer and Platypus Threads Not the Same
by Bill Kennedy
04/11/18 09:19 PM
Backcountry Discussion - Featured Topics
Donnell Fire in the Sierra
by balzaccom
09/10/18 08:51 PM
Leaving a Mark
by balzaccom
07/10/18 09:32 PM
What's your water crossing technique/method?
by willie1280
06/08/18 08:09 AM
Make Your Own Gear - Featured Topics
Featured Photos
Breakneck Ridge, New York
May 2012 Eclipse, Lassen Park
New Years Eve 2011
Trip Report with Photos
Seven Devils, Idaho
Oat Hill Mine Trail 2012
Dark Canyon - Utah
Who's Online
0 registered (), 31 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
grantwiley, jullybina, Korak, brucegrimes, Simon Eklöv
12642 Registered Users
Forum Links
Site Links
Lightweight Gear Store
Backpacking Book Store
Lightweight Zone
Hiking Essentials

Our long-time Sponsor, - The leading source for ultralite/lightweight outdoor gear:

Backcountry Forum

Since 1996 - the Original Backcountry Forum
Copyright © The Lightweight Backpacker & BackcountryForum