Backcountry Forum
Backpacking & Hiking Gear

Backcountry Forum
Our long-time Sponsor - the leading source for ultralite/lightweight outdoor gear
 
 
 

Amazon.com
Backpacking Forums
---- Our Gear Store ----
The Lightweight Gear Store
 
 WINTER CAMPING 

Shelters
Bivy Bags
Sleeping Bags
Sleeping Pads
Snow Sports
Winter Kitchen

 SNOWSPORTS 

Snowshoes
Avalanche Gear
Skins
Hats, Gloves, & Gaiters
Accessories

 ULTRA-LIGHT 

Ultralight Backpacks
Ultralight Bivy Sacks
Ultralight Shelters
Ultralight Tarps
Ultralight Tents
Ultralight Raingear
Ultralight Stoves & Cookware
Ultralight Down Sleeping Bags
Ultralight Synthetic Sleep Bags
Ultralight Apparel


the Titanium Page
WM Extremelite Sleeping Bags

 CAMPING & HIKING 

Backpacks
Tents
Sleeping Bags
Hydration
Kitchen
Accessories

 CLIMBING 

Ropes & Cordage
Protection & Hardware
Carabiners & Quickdraws
Climbing Packs & Bags
Big Wall
Rescue & Industrial

 MEN'S APPAREL 

Jackets
Shirts
Baselayer
Headwear
Gloves
Accessories

 WOMEN'S APPAREL 

Jackets
Shirts
Baselayer
Headwear
Gloves
Accessories

 FOOTWEAR 

Men's Footwear
Women's Footwear

 CLEARANCE 

Backpacks
Mens Apparel
Womens Apparel
Climbing
Footwear
Accessories

 BRANDS 

Black Diamond
Granite Gear
La Sportiva
Osprey
Smartwool

 WAYS TO SHOP 

Sale
Clearance
Top Brands
All Brands

 Backpacking Equipment 

Shelters
BackPacks
Sleeping Bags
Water Treatment
Kitchen
Hydration
Climbing


 Backcountry Gear Clearance

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#202375 - 01/09/19 03:22 PM New $300 gear challenge from Mags.
OregonMouse Offline
member

Registered: 02/03/06
Posts: 6799
Loc: Gateway to Columbia Gorge
PMags has updated his $300 gear challenge for frugal backpackers (especially beginners with not much money). It's a good basic list for beginners: slightly under $300 and under 15 lbs. base weight.

The Frugal Backpacker--$300 Gear Challenge--updated January 2019

Note that he has omitted thrift shop bargains, sales, used gear, because those often can't be duplicated. By shopping those possibilities, you may be able to save more or get higher quality gear. PMags includes possible upgrades.


Edited by OregonMouse (01/09/19 03:27 PM)
_________________________
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view--E. Abbey

Top
#202378 - 01/09/19 08:09 PM Re: New $300 gear challenge from Mags. [Re: OregonMouse]
OregonMouse Offline
member

Registered: 02/03/06
Posts: 6799
Loc: Gateway to Columbia Gorge
While the above is serious, for fun I followed a link in the article and came up with this wonderful bit of humor:

Mad Libs Gear Review Edition

Enjoy! lol
_________________________
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view--E. Abbey

Top
#202379 - 01/10/19 11:51 PM Re: New $300 gear challenge from Mags. [Re: OregonMouse]
Bill Kennedy Offline
member

Registered: 02/27/18
Posts: 332
Loc: Portland, Oregon
That is funny. Those all-good reviews drive me nuts. Second only to the ones that read, "I just got this yesterday, and boy, is it great!"

Regarding your original post, I sometimes worry that get-by-cheap lists will cause someone to go out unprepared. For instance, if someone thought that was really a 20-degree bag. I like cheap, though, so I always read them.
_________________________
Always remember that you are absolutely unique, just like everybody else. -Margaret Mead

Top
#202381 - 01/11/19 01:21 PM Re: New $300 gear challenge from Mags. [Re: Bill Kennedy]
OregonMouse Offline
member

Registered: 02/03/06
Posts: 6799
Loc: Gateway to Columbia Gorge
You can assume it's a 20* bag only if it's EN13537 tested, the comfort rating is 20*F, and you are following the test conditions by wearing your base layer and a knit cap and your pad is R-rated to 5.0 or higher. If you're an unusually cold sleeper, even this may not work (after all, humans are not test dummies). Also remember that most of us females definitely need to use the "comfort" rating.

For el-cheapo non-tested bags, we always assumed in pre-testing days that the rating is at least 10* warmer than the rating set by the manufacturer's marketing dept. Again, if you're female, add another 10*. So a generic untested 20*F bag will be nearer a 40*F bag for most women and for male cold sleepers.

It is also a good idea to test any new gear in your backyard or a nearby campground, where you can retreat to your bedroom or your car if anything goes wrong, before heading out on the trails. This is especially important for beginners, who need to practice using the gear before trying to set up camp on a dark and stormy night, flashlight in one hand and instructions in the other. For a sleeping system (bag or quilt and pad), testing under similar conditions (20*F) is a good idea. This can be done in back yard, patio, balcony, or car campground next to the car (and with extra blankets in said car).

Note that PMags has used this gear in the conditions he describes (summer in the Colorado Rockies) and it's similar to what he used when he first started out. As he points out, a few $$ more or a lucky sale (which he deliberately doesn't factor in) can produce better gear, sometimes cheaper.


Edited by OregonMouse (01/11/19 04:07 PM)
_________________________
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view--E. Abbey

Top
#202383 - 01/11/19 02:43 PM Re: New $300 gear challenge from Mags. [Re: OregonMouse]
Bill Kennedy Offline
member

Registered: 02/27/18
Posts: 332
Loc: Portland, Oregon
You're right, it's the EN13537 comfort rating that you should look at, but the standard includes the other ratings which makes it easier for manufacturers to rate them too optimistically, while at the same time claiming an "official" rating. EN13537 has some problems...here's an interesting link:

https://www.outdoorindustry.org/pdf/EN13537Mccullough062209.pdf

Personally, I think Moonstone had it right with their "zone" system. For instance, a "zone 2" bag was rated for 20 to 35 degrees, depending on whether the user was a warm sleeper or a cold sleeper.
_________________________
Always remember that you are absolutely unique, just like everybody else. -Margaret Mead

Top
#202384 - 01/11/19 03:46 PM Re: New $300 gear challenge from Mags. [Re: OregonMouse]
Glenn Roberts Offline
Moderator

Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 2208
Loc: Southwest Ohio
The “comfort, “limit,” and “risk” ratings are definitely being exploited by the marketing folks. I was just looking at Thermarest bags and quilts; a couple of years ago, they named their bags on the comfort rating, but now they use the limit rating (the “Super Sun 40” of a couple years ago is now the “Super Sun 30.”)

While I was shopping for the quilt I wanted, I ignored the number in the name, and purchase based on comfort rating. That way, I’ve got a margin of error built in: if I buy a bag with a 40-degree comfort rating and a 30-degree limit rating, I should be good if the temps unexpectedly drop into the mid or lower 30s. (FWIW, I ended up with the Thermarest Vesper 32 - it has a 41 degree comfort rating, and I’m at the point in my life where I cancel trips if the lows are predicted below 40 - which is an in-town prediction; it will probably be 5-10 degrees colder in the woods. The other safety margin is Montbell Superior Down jacket and matching down pants, which I can wear in addition to the longjohns. I sleep a bit cold, so I wouldn’t use any pad rated lower than R-5.)

Marketers do the same thing with packs, but there’s no standard method: the “Maxout 60” has a 60-liter capacity by counting the lid, outside stuff-it and water bottle pockets, and main compartment; the “Bonecrusher 50” counts only the main compartment. Arrrgh!

In the end, it’s not enough to go by the temperature ratings. You have to know whether you sleep hot or cold, whether you’ll be using it in the open or in a tent (tarps and three-sided shelters provide only minimal windbreaks), and what type of trips you like to take.

Top
#202388 - 01/11/19 06:10 PM Re: New $300 gear challenge from Mags. [Re: Glenn Roberts]
41253 Offline
member

Registered: 12/28/14
Posts: 105
For years I used what Colin Fletcher called "Visqueen," or thick painters plastic. It's lighter, easier to cut to the right size, and packs smaller than the blue tarps. Instead of the fancy ball-hoop tie points that Colin wrote about I just balled up some dirt and leaves lassoed it with a line with a fixed bowline knot on the end.

Top
#202389 - 01/11/19 08:20 PM Re: New $300 gear challenge from Mags. [Re: 41253]
Glenn Roberts Offline
Moderator

Registered: 12/23/08
Posts: 2208
Loc: Southwest Ohio
I used Visqueen with the Vis-Klamps for a couple of years while I saved up for a coated nylon tarp (more compact, built-in tie-out points.) They worked well as shelter from rain (I never got wet), but not so much as a windbreak.

Top

Shout Box

Highest Quality Lightweight Down Sleeping Bags
 
Western Mountaineering Sleeping Bags
 
Lite Gear Talk - Featured Topics
Backcountry Discussion - Featured Topics
Make Your Own Gear - Featured Topics
Featured Photos
Spiderco Chaparral Pocketknife
David & Goliath
Also Testing
Trip Report with Photos
Seven Devils, Idaho
Oat Hill Mine Trail 2012
Dark Canyon - Utah
Who's Online
0 registered (), 257 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Noodles, McCrary, DanyBacky, Rashy Willia, WanderBison
13240 Registered Users
Forum Links
Disclaimer
Policies
Site Links
Backpacking.net
Lightweight Gear Store
Backpacking Book Store
Lightweight Zone
Hiking Essentials

Our long-time Sponsor, BackcountryGear.com - The leading source for ultralite/lightweight outdoor gear:

Backcountry Forum
 

Affiliate Disclaimer: This forum is an affiliate of BackcountryGear.com, Amazon.com, R.E.I. and others. The product links herein are linked to their sites. If you follow these links to make a purchase, we may get a small commission. This is our only source of support for these forums. Thanks.!
 
 

Since 1996 - the Original Backcountry Forum
Copyright © The Lightweight Backpacker & BackcountryForum